Using GaN for High-Performance Gate Driving

GaN technology is a true enabler for power stages, today providing performance that was unthinkable in the previous decade. The maximum performance and benefits from GaN are obtained only when the gate driver matches the same degree of performance and innovation as the transistors.
After many years of research and development, MinDCet has overcome the pitfalls in GaN gate driving by introducing the MDC901 gate driver. Since the introduction of the first gallium nitride (GaN) transistors over ten years ago, their advantages in power electronics have become well-known.
Indeed, the material properties of gallium nitride offer lower parasitic capacitances for a given on-resistance, inherent fast switching transients, lack of reverse recovery and high-temperature operation capability. These excellent properties are seemingly the perfect combination for high-performing power converters.
However, two important aspects must be considered to achieve GaN‘s performance potential. Firstly, it is a common conception that gallium nitride’s fast transient switching capability will directly lead to significantly higher switching frequencies and resultantly, higher efficiencies.
When GaN is switched at the optimal speed it will indeed show lower switching losses compared to MOSFET technology, for a given frequency. The primary reason for the comparatively lower GaN switching losses is the decreased time during the switching transient, the time when voltage and current are simultaneously present over and through the switch.
The Joule losses caused by this switching loss increase linearly with frequency. Eventually, when operating gallium nitride at increasingly higher switching frequencies, the resulting GaN efficiency may become equal or potentially lower than a MOSFET-based converter. Although there are diminishing efficiency benefits of GaN at higher switching frequencies, the GaN-based converters additionally benefit from the use of smaller storage passives, equating to a higher power density.
Figure 1: The measured efficiency as a function of the output current for a 48V to 3.3V GaN-based buck converter, at different switching frequencies.
This effect is demonstrated with a 48V to 3.3V step-down buck converter, built around the MinDCet MDC901 gate driver, a GaN Systems GS61008P half-bridge and a WE-HCF 1.4uH/31.5A power inductor, as depicted in Figure 5. The low converter duty cycle benefits from the fast switching transient speeds, resulting in a 10 to 15 percent efficiency increase over an equivalent MOSFET-based converter at the same switching frequency.
The buck converter measurement in Figure 1 exemplifies that despite GaN’s capabilities, the conversion efficiency decreases as switching frequency increases. Already at moderate switching frequencies of 300 kHz, a clear decrease of nearly 1 percent efficiency per additional 100 kHz in switching frequency can be observed over the measured frequencies from 300 to 700 kHz.
For a 48V to 12V buck converter this trade-off changes. Examining Figure 2, the GaN converter efficiency benefits from a higher switching frequency at low- to moderate loads (up to about 10A) over the 300 to 700 kHz range. To be noted is that the selected inductor has an impact on converter efficiency. Care must be taken in making the right trade-offs in the gallium nitride-based converter design.
Figure 2: The measured efficiency as a function of the output current for a 48V to 12V GaN-based buck converter, at different switching frequencies.
Secondly, to enable the true intrinsic benefits of gallium nitride, it is necessary to switch at high transient speeds. Values from 10V/ns up to 100V/ ns and beyond are possible. The main component responsible for transient speed is the gate driver. Naturally, proper circuit design, specifically power routing, gate-loop routing and decoupling, needs to be implemented to enable the gate-driver and GaN to do their work optimally.
In general, a standard MOSFET gate driver may in unique cases be able to drive GaN, but optimal performance will not be reached. As a consequence the benefits of using GaN are partly lost. A gate driver that switches gallium nitride at high transient speeds must fulfill specific requirements while simultaneously being subjected to significant stresses. These stringent requirements can only be met by a gate driver carefully developed to work with GaN.
Pitfalls for GaN Gate-Driving
GaN transistors in power applications have a lot of potential: higher power efficiency, higher power density, potential heat-sink/fan-less design. However, getting the maximal benefit from a gallium nitride stage requires careful driving, avoiding the pitfalls along the road.
High Slew Rates
Driving GaN transistors is very ambiguous. These devices are chosen for their inherently large voltage slew rates (in excess of 100V/ns), which leads to very low switching losses (losses incurred when Vds and Ids are not zero). The quick switchover between low and highside transistors causes the load current to alternate very quickly between load and input voltage (e.g. buck converter applications).
This poses hard constraints to the bus voltage decoupling, as PCB tracks to the half-bridge cause overshoot, highly defined by the bus loop inductance. Additionally, the high slew rates inject large peak currents into the gate driving path through the drain source capacitance of the off-state transistor.
Parasitic Turn-On
In a half-bridge configuration, parasitic turn-on can occur to the transistor that is turned off, when its drain-source voltage is suddenly increasing to the bus voltage, either actively by the opposing transistor or inductively through the load current. This current will be converted to a non-zero gate voltage both by the gate driver pull-down impedance and the gate-source loop inductance.
If this voltage is higher than the threshold voltage, a cross current will occur between the high-side and low-side switches of the half-bridge. Low gate loop inductance is only possible in monolithic co-integration of the powerstage and gate-driver, where a separate pull-down and pull-up path for each GaN transistor is very desirable.
Dead-time in a half-bridge is the time between the turn-off event of one transistor and the turn-on event of the complementary bridge transistor. Granular control of the dead-time is essential. Too short of a dead-time will cause excess losses as the GaN drain-source capacitance is discharged by the complementary GaN.
Zero voltage switching occurs at larger dead-times, allowing the drain-source capacitance to be discharged by the inductor (in a buck converter). Consequently, this energy is not dissipated. Too long dead-times will introduce larger losses as the reverse conduction of a GaN with zero Vgs is subject to a larger voltage drop (of a few volts) compared to a diode. Fixed dead-times lead to a suboptimal efficiency and must be tuned to the proper dead-time for minimal loss, which is highly application-dependent.
Gate Overcharging
In non-isolated gate-drive applications, the gate driver is often supplied through bootstrapping of the low voltage supply. This technique will charge the high-side gate driver supply decoupling capacitor through a fast high-voltage diode. This generates a floating voltage that is used to supply all floating circuitry used to drive the high-side predriver.
As explained before, the non-zero deadtime will cause the drain-source voltage of the low-side GaN transistor – depending on the current magnitude direction of the load – to go below zero. This effectively causes the bootstrap capacitor to charge beyond the input supply. A gallium nitride gate is known to be notoriously sensitive to gate overvoltages, therefore the gate needs protection against overcharging to ensure reliability of the converter.
In practice this is reduced through the use of clamping structures, at the cost of increased gate driver power consumption and PCB real estate with its effectiveness limited by PCB parasitics.
Negative Output Voltage Operation
The negative swing of the output driver voltage depends on the parasitic source inductance and the load conditions of the power converter, which can be poorly predicted.
For predictable operation, a guarantee that the converter bridge can always be controlled is required, even when going negative in voltage compared to the supply grounds. In a DC coupled level-shifter, special precautions must be taken to allow operation below supply ground.
Conclusions
Enabling the true benefits of GaN power stages requires implementing an optimized gate-driver that is designed specifically to work with GaN transistors. Resultantly, the GaN can be pushed to the limits, yielding the highest possible performance, which provides for a maximum return on the technological and monetary investment. A discrete gate-driver such as the MDC901 provides the user with the flexibility, diagnostics and an expanded feature set for choosing the best-suited GaN transistors for the given application.